Questions about the rules

Started by P3D, April 24, 2007, 11:56:32 AM

Previous topic - Next topic

P3D

Quote from: Earl822
When did ship cost go up?

What ship cost?
The first purpose of a warship is to remain afloat. Anon.
Below 40 degrees, there is no law. Below 50 degrees, there is no God. sailor's maxim on weather in the Southern seas

Earl822

the SS cost multiplier went up from 6 to 10, which to put it bluntly has blown up my budget completely

Borys

Ahoj!
Oh, I've been using x10 since the begining ...
Borys
NEDS - Not Enough Deck Space for all those guns and torpedos;
Bambi must DIE!

Carthaginian

Quote from: Borys on April 24, 2007, 12:26:03 PM
Ahoj!
Oh, I've been using x10 since the begining ...
Borys

As have I.
I thought it was like that since we started here.
So 'ere's to you, Fuzzy-Wuzzy, at your 'ome in old Baghdad;
You're a pore benighted 'eathen but a first-class fightin' man;
We gives you your certificate, an' if you want it signed
We'll come an' 'ave a romp with you whenever you're inclined.

Earl822

it was 6 at the point when I wrote my reports for 1906-1909, admittedly that was some time ago, but I still think that 6 was a more reasonable multiplier as for most of us a 12500ton cruiser is now equivalent to about one sixth of the military budget.

I can work with 10, but I will now be about a half behind as it will take time to completely rewrite the budget.

P3D

Thread split.

The multiplier 6 was what I got from cost comparisons. It was increased to 10 because I felt ship cost was marginal in the budget - and it's much easier to multiply by 10 than 6.
The first purpose of a warship is to remain afloat. Anon.
Below 40 degrees, there is no law. Below 50 degrees, there is no God. sailor's maxim on weather in the Southern seas

Ithekro

I don't even remember a cost multiplier of 6.  By the time I figured stuff out it was 10.

Earl822

thats where a calculator comes in, and an AC, w at $7.4 (with a multiplier of 6) then comes in at $11.6 (with a multiplier of 10) which is a massive increase on the scale of our budgets. Assuming each $1, was $1Million RL dollars, in 1905 that is..... (couldn't find a resource to give me the 1905 exhange rate) but using the rough exchange rate of today ($2=£1) that is £5.8 Million, almost as much as HMS Hood cost.

I used what I remembered, assuming something like that wouldn't have been changed as it would mess so much up, but give me a week, and all new reports will be working from the right scale.

Ithekro

Until after the Great War a pound sterling would get you $4.866 US.

Since we are multiplying the "x" pounds by 10 to get the N-verse $ amount, the actual price is still "x" pounds sterling.

Remember, none of use are Great Britian. France probably couldn't afford the Royal navy.  None of us can afford to build the Royal Navy.  Rohan would have trouble building the German or American Navies from this time period (of course I'm building my ships a little large in the cruiser department), and is more or less building half to three-quarters of what the Germans were able to build historically...which is better than what I was doing earlier I might add.  At least I can afford to lay down two heavy ships a year now where as before I was barely getting one a year if that.  We'll see if I can afford to build them (actual materials produced) on time.  But I can't afford to follow the American practice exactly (as my two ships per year is actualy three ships one year, one the next year, half battleships, half battlecruisers).

P3D

There's some excacge rate calculations, let me dig them up.
The first purpose of a warship is to remain afloat. Anon.
Below 40 degrees, there is no law. Below 50 degrees, there is no God. sailor's maxim on weather in the Southern seas