Notice!

Started by Desertfox, March 19, 2007, 09:38:52 AM

Previous topic - Next topic

Desertfox

Right, I too am having problems classifying my Cruisers, as some lie right in the middle of PC and AC. The ex-ACM ships I classified as Protected Cruisers.
"We don't run from the end of the world. We CHARGE!" Schlock

http://www.schlockmercenary.com/d/20090102.html

Ithekro

Than I have reclassified them for this section as such.  The Mark will still call then Belted Cruisers as they are not protected cruiser nor armored cruisers.

Desertfox

I classify mine as Heavy Cruisers, Cruisers, and Light Cruisers. Protected cruisers being older, slower, or foreign built ones. We should come up with a standard classification system. Not IC but for OOC purposes such as this one or the fleet lists in our reports. That way we can compare equal ships.
"We don't run from the end of the world. We CHARGE!" Schlock

http://www.schlockmercenary.com/d/20090102.html

swamphen

#33
Here's the DKB at the end of 1906:

BB 4 (1)
BC 0 (2)
AC+CA 7
PC+CL 13 (3)
DD/TB 35 (6)
KB 8
SS 1

Korpen

More accurate:
The Netherlands:     
BB: 6 (+1 that will be scraped)           
AF:14           
Sloops: 16                   
DD/TB: 58 (10)   
GB: 12 (5) 
Card-carrying member of the Battlecruiser Fan Club.

Borys

Habsburg  3              3             16(4)              2              35             
NEDS - Not Enough Deck Space for all those guns and torpedos;
Bambi must DIE!

Earl822

United Norman Kingdom as of h1/1907

Royal Navy:-
    In service(rebuilding)building+Reserve

BB  9(0)2+2
AC  5(0)2+0
LC 19(0)0+0
DD 71(0)0+0
SS   6(0)4+0
Aux 4(0)0+0

Walter

#37
Looks good for Japan.
More accurate (1/1/1906):
        BB      AC      PC      CB      DD      GB      SS 
Japan   8(3)    8(3)    17(1)   -       29(18)  9       5(2)


Japan 1/1/1907:
        BB      AC      PC      CB      DD      GB      SS 
Japan   10(2)   8(3)    17(1)   -       44(5)   9       7