Esc Corvettes

Started by ledeper, October 14, 2009, 04:22:44 PM

Previous topic - Next topic

ledeper

01-99, Esc Corvettes laid down 1917 (Engine 1916)

Displacement:
   453 t light; 470 t standard; 550 t normal; 615 t full load

Dimensions: Length overall / water x beam x draught
   196,49 ft / 193,57 ft x 21,33 ft x 9,84 ft (normal load)
   59,89 m / 59,00 m x 6,50 m  x 3,00 m

Armament:
      2 - 3,94" / 100 mm guns in single mounts, 30,51lbs / 13,84kg shells, 1917 Model
     Quick firing guns in deck mounts
     on centreline, all forward, 1 raised mount
      1 - 1,57" / 40,0 mm guns in single mounts, 1,95lbs / 0,89kg shells, 1917 Model
     Anti-aircraft gun in deck mount
     on side, 1 raised gun
   Weight of broadside 63 lbs / 29 kg
   Shells per gun, main battery: 150

Armour:
   - Gun armour:   Face (max)   Other gunhouse (avg)   Barbette/hoist (max)
   Main:   0,98" / 25 mm         -               -

   - Conning tower: 0,98" / 25 mm

Machinery:
   Oil fired boilers, steam turbines,
   Geared drive, 12 shafts, 5.006 shp / 3.734 Kw = 22,00 kts
   Range 4.500nm at 12,00 kts
   Bunker at max displacement = 145 tons

Complement:
   56 - 73

Cost:
   £0,088 million / $0,353 million

Distribution of weights at normal displacement:
   Armament: 8 tons, 1,4 %
   Armour: 6 tons, 1,0 %
      - Belts: 0 tons, 0,0 %
      - Torpedo bulkhead: 0 tons, 0,0 %
      - Armament: 4 tons, 0,8 %
      - Armour Deck: 0 tons, 0,0 %
      - Conning Tower: 1 tons, 0,3 %
   Machinery: 186 tons, 33,9 %
   Hull, fittings & equipment: 213 tons, 38,8 %
   Fuel, ammunition & stores: 97 tons, 17,6 %
   Miscellaneous weights: 40 tons, 7,3 %

Overall survivability and seakeeping ability:
   Survivability (Non-critical penetrating hits needed to sink ship):
     429 lbs / 195 Kg = 14,1 x 3,9 " / 100 mm shells or 0,3 torpedoes
   Stability (Unstable if below 1.00): 1,10
   Metacentric height 0,6 ft / 0,2 m
   Roll period: 11,7 seconds
   Steadiness   - As gun platform (Average = 50 %): 75 %
         - Recoil effect (Restricted arc if above 1.00): 0,33
   Seaboat quality  (Average = 1.00): 1,50

Hull form characteristics:
   Hull has a flush deck
   Block coefficient: 0,474
   Length to Beam Ratio: 9,08 : 1
   'Natural speed' for length: 13,91 kts
   Power going to wave formation at top speed: 65 %
   Trim (Max stability = 0, Max steadiness = 100): 50
   Bow angle (Positive = bow angles forward): 10,00 degrees
   Stern overhang: 0,00 ft / 0,00 m
   Freeboard (% = measuring location as a percentage of overall length):
      - Stem:      16,54 ft / 5,04 m
      - Forecastle (20 %):   10,53 ft / 3,21 m
      - Mid (50 %):      10,53 ft / 3,21 m
      - Quarterdeck (15 %):   10,53 ft / 3,21 m
      - Stern:      10,53 ft / 3,21 m
      - Average freeboard:   11,01 ft / 3,36 m

Ship space, strength and comments:
   Space   - Hull below water (magazines/engines, low = better): 128,8 %
      - Above water (accommodation/working, high = better): 96,3 %
   Waterplane Area: 2.687 Square feet or 250 Square metres
   Displacement factor (Displacement / loading): 114 %
   Structure weight / hull surface area: 33 lbs/sq ft or 161 Kg/sq metre
   Hull strength (Relative):
      - Cross-sectional: 0,82
      - Longitudinal: 6,21
      - Overall: 1,00
   Hull space for machinery, storage, compartmentation is cramped
   Room for accommodation and workspaces is adequate
   Ship has slow, easy roll, a good, steady gun platform
   Excellent seaboat, comfortable, can fire her guns in the heaviest weather

Wt 15 tns
DC 15 tns (45 DC)
D/C Gear 10 tn

Kaiser Kirk

Quote12 shafts
Otherwise looks decent.

For my tastes, I'd rather see a diesel or VTE engine in such a craft.  I have the impression that in the real world, geared turbines would seem pricey and likely more maintenance intensive....but not sure.
Did they beat the drum slowly,
Did they play the fife lowly,
Did they sound the death march, as they lowered you down,
Did the band play the last post and chorus,
Did the pipes play the flowers of the forest

Tanthalas

Quote from: Kaiser Kirk on October 14, 2009, 04:40:28 PM
Quote12 shafts
Otherwise looks decent.

For my tastes, I'd rather see a diesel or VTE engine in such a craft.  I have the impression that in the real world, geared turbines would seem pricey and likely more maintenance intensive....but not sure.

I agree Diesel on a ship like this.
"He either fears his fate too much,
Or his desserts are small,
Who dares not put it to the touch,
To win or lose it all!"

James Graham, 5th Earl of Montrose
1612 to 1650
Royalist General during the English Civil War

ledeper

 ;) ;) :D

01-99, Esc Corvettes laid down 1917 (Engine 1916)

Displacement:
   453 t light; 470 t standard; 550 t normal; 615 t full load

Dimensions: Length overall / water x beam x draught
   196,49 ft / 193,57 ft x 21,33 ft x 9,84 ft (normal load)
   59,89 m / 59,00 m x 6,50 m  x 3,00 m

Armament:
     2 - 3,94" / 100 mm guns in single mounts, 30,51lbs / 13,84kg shells, 1917 Model
     Quick firing guns in deck mounts
     on centreline, all forward, 1 raised mount
     1 - 1,57" / 40,0 mm guns in single mounts, 1,95lbs / 0,88kg shells, 1917 Model
     Anti-aircraft gun in deck mount
     on side, 1 raised gun
   Weight of broadside 63 lbs / 29 kg
   Shells per gun, main battery: 150

Armour:
  - Gun armour:   Face (max)   Other gunhouse (avg)   Barbette/hoist (max)
   Main:   0,98" / 25 mm         -               -

  - Conning tower: 0,98" / 25 mm

Machinery:
   Diesel Internal combustion motors,
   Direct drive, 1 shaft, 5.006 shp / 3.734 Kw = 22,00 kts
   Range 4.500nm at 12,00 kts
   Bunker at max displacement = 145 tons

Complement:
   56 - 73

Cost:
   £0,088 million / $0,353 million

Distribution of weights at normal displacement:
   Armament: 8 tons, 1,4 %
   Armour: 6 tons, 1,0 %
      - Belts: 0 tons, 0,0 %
      - Torpedo bulkhead: 0 tons, 0,0 %
      - Armament: 4 tons, 0,8 %
      - Armour Deck: 0 tons, 0,0 %
      - Conning Tower: 1 tons, 0,3 %
   Machinery: 186 tons, 33,9 %
   Hull, fittings & equipment: 213 tons, 38,8 %
   Fuel, ammunition & stores: 97 tons, 17,6 %
   Miscellaneous weights: 40 tons, 7,3 %

Overall survivability and seakeeping ability:
   Survivability (Non-critical penetrating hits needed to sink ship):
     429 lbs / 195 Kg = 14,1 x 3,9 " / 100 mm shells or 0,3 torpedoes
   Stability (Unstable if below 1.00): 1,10
   Metacentric height 0,6 ft / 0,2 m
   Roll period: 11,7 seconds
   Steadiness   - As gun platform (Average = 50 %): 75 %
         - Recoil effect (Restricted arc if above 1.00): 0,33
   Seaboat quality  (Average = 1.00): 1,50

Hull form characteristics:
   Hull has a flush deck
   Block coefficient: 0,474
   Length to Beam Ratio: 9,08 : 1
   'Natural speed' for length: 13,91 kts
   Power going to wave formation at top speed: 65 %
   Trim (Max stability = 0, Max steadiness = 100): 50
   Bow angle (Positive = bow angles forward): 10,00 degrees
   Stern overhang: 0,00 ft / 0,00 m
   Freeboard (% = measuring location as a percentage of overall length):
      - Stem:      16,54 ft / 5,04 m
      - Forecastle (20 %):   10,53 ft / 3,21 m
      - Mid (50 %):      10,53 ft / 3,21 m
      - Quarterdeck (15 %):   10,53 ft / 3,21 m
      - Stern:      10,53 ft / 3,21 m
      - Average freeboard:   11,01 ft / 3,36 m

Ship space, strength and comments:
   Space   - Hull below water (magazines/engines, low = better): 128,8 %
      - Above water (accommodation/working, high = better): 96,3 %
   Waterplane Area: 2.687 Square feet or 250 Square metres
   Displacement factor (Displacement / loading): 114 %
   Structure weight / hull surface area: 33 lbs/sq ft or 161 Kg/sq metre
   Hull strength (Relative):
      - Cross-sectional: 0,82
      - Longitudinal: 6,21
      - Overall: 1,00
   Hull space for machinery, storage, compartmentation is cramped
   Room for accommodation and workspaces is adequate
   Ship has slow, easy roll, a good, steady gun platform
   Excellent seaboat, comfortable, can fire her guns in the heaviest weather

Wt 15 tns
DC 15 tns (45 DC)
D/C Gear 10 tn

mentat


not sure on small ships - but they do seem a bit thin - narrow beam of just 21' - and stability is quite low at 1.1

would something a bit 'fatter' be safer ship?